Which of the following is considered a valuable source of information for identifying risks?

The identification of risks is a critical component of risk management, and past incidents and breaches serve as a valuable source of information in this context. Analyzing previous breaches allows organizations to understand the types of vulnerabilities that have been exploited, the effectiveness of past security measures, and the potential impacts of similar incidents on their systems. This historical perspective enables organizations to assess their current security posture and identify areas that require improvement or increased vigilance.

In contrast, while expert opinions, employee interviews, and industry reports can all contribute valuable insights into the risk landscape, they may not provide the same level of direct, practical information that historical incidents do. For example, expert opinions might reflect theoretical risks or trends, and employee interviews could highlight perceptions of risk rather than data-driven evidence. Industry reports may aggregate data on risks but lack the specificity that an organization can gain from analyzing incidents directly related to its context. Therefore, reliance on past incidents and breaches enhances an organization's ability to proactively identify and mitigate risks based on real-world experiences.